All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

"Ouch!" or "Aah!": Are Vocalizations of 'Laugh', 'Neutral', 'Fear', 'Pain' or 'Pleasure' Reliably Rated?

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11240%2F23%3A10453963" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11240/23:10453963 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/00216208:11310/23:10453963

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=Iuh_y.gwKJ" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=Iuh_y.gwKJ</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.22330/he/38/017-047" target="_blank" >10.22330/he/38/017-047</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    "Ouch!" or "Aah!": Are Vocalizations of 'Laugh', 'Neutral', 'Fear', 'Pain' or 'Pleasure' Reliably Rated?

  • Original language description

    Our research consisted of two studies focusing on the probability of humans being able to perceive the difference between valence of human vocalizations of high (pain, pleasure and fear) and low intensity (laugh and neutral speech). The first study was conducted online and used a large sample (????=902) of respondents. The second study was conducted in a laboratory setting and involved a stress induction procedure. For both, the task was to categorize whether the human vocalization was rated positive, neutral or negative. Stimuli were audio records extracted from freely downloadable online videos and can be considered semi-naturalistic. Each rating participant (rater) was presented with five audio records (stimuli) of five females and of five males. All raters were presented with the stimuli twice (so as to statistically estimate the consistency of the ratings). Using a Bayesian statistical approach, we could test for consistencies and due-to-chance probabilities. The outcomes support the prediction that the results (ratings) are repeatable (not due to chance) but incorrectly attributed, decreasing the communication value of the expressions of fear, pain, and pleasure. Stress induction (in study two conducted on 28 participants) did have an impact on the ratings of male neutral and laugh - it caused decrease in correct attribution.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>ost</sub> - Miscellaneous article in a specialist periodical

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50101 - Psychology (including human - machine relations)

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/GJ19-12885Y" target="_blank" >GJ19-12885Y: Behavioral and Psycho-Physiological Response on Ambivalent Visual and Auditory Stimuli Presentation</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2023

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Human Ethology

  • ISSN

    2224-4476

  • e-ISSN

    2224-4476

  • Volume of the periodical

    2023

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    38

  • Country of publishing house

    GB - UNITED KINGDOM

  • Number of pages

    31

  • Pages from-to

    17-47

  • UT code for WoS article

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database