What Do We Know About the Validity and Reliability of Mindfulness Self-Report Measures in Persons with Dementia?: A Critical Narrative Review
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11240%2F25%3A10501201" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11240/25:10501201 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=X_CJX02xoJ" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=X_CJX02xoJ</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2024.2427268" target="_blank" >10.1080/07317115.2024.2427268</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
What Do We Know About the Validity and Reliability of Mindfulness Self-Report Measures in Persons with Dementia?: A Critical Narrative Review
Original language description
ObjectivesMindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) for persons with dementia (PwD) have yielded mixed results, possibly attributable to the fact that little is known about the validity and reliability of trait mindfulness self-report measures in PwD. This narrative review sought to identify studies involving self-reported trait mindfulness and other clinical measures that may hold information on the convergent validity and reliability of these measures in PwD.MethodsScientific databases were searched for studies involving PwD and mindfulness assessments.ResultsN = 426 studies from PubMed and N = 156 from PsychInfo databases were reviewed. Four cross-sectional studies were identified that allowed inferences about the validity of mindfulness measures. A qualitative review indicated that convergent validity with other measures varied with sample heterogeneity and cognitive impairment. Merely one MBI included self-reported trait mindfulness, however without reporting sample-specific validity or reliability.ConclusionsDespite efforts to implement MBIs in PwD, information on basic methodological psychometric issues is minimal. Future studies ought to address the validity and reliability of self-reported mindfulness in detail across different stages of dementia.Clinical ImplicationsResults of MBIs need to be considered cautiously. Basic information about psychometric properties of mindfulness self-report measures is required and these measures need to be included systematically in MBIs.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30300 - Health sciences
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2025
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Clinical Gerontologist
ISSN
0731-7115
e-ISSN
1545-2301
Volume of the periodical
48
Issue of the periodical within the volume
3
Country of publishing house
US - UNITED STATES
Number of pages
15
Pages from-to
386-400
UT code for WoS article
001359375900001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85210018343