All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Do invasive species perform better in their new ranges?

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11310%2F13%3A10159416" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11310/13:10159416 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/67985939:_____/13:00421830

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/12-1810.1" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/12-1810.1</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/12-1810.1" target="_blank" >10.1890/12-1810.1</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Do invasive species perform better in their new ranges?

  • Original language description

    A fundamental assumption in invasion biology is that most invasive species exhibit enhanced performance in their introduced range relative to their home ranges. This idea has given rise to numerous hypotheses explaining "invasion success" by virtue of altered ecological and evolutionary pressures. There are surprisingly few data, however, testing the underlying assumption that the performance of introduced populations, including organism size, reproductive output, and abundance, is enhanced in their introduced compared to their native range. Here, we combined data from published studies to test this hypothesis for 26 plant and 27 animal species that are considered to be invasive. On average, individuals of these 53 species were indeed larger, more fecund, and more abundant in their introduced ranges. The overall mean, however, belied significant variability among species, as roughly half of the investigated species (N = 27) performed similarly when compared to conspecific populations i

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)

  • CEP classification

    EF - Botany

  • OECD FORD branch

Result continuities

  • Project

    Result was created during the realization of more than one project. More information in the Projects tab.

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2013

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Ecology

  • ISSN

    0012-9658

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    94

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    5

  • Country of publishing house

    US - UNITED STATES

  • Number of pages

    10

  • Pages from-to

    985-994

  • UT code for WoS article

    000318969800001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database