All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

A new methodology to assess the performance and uncertainty of source apportionment models II: The results of two European intercomparison exercises

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11310%2F15%3A10316587" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11310/15:10316587 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.10.068" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.10.068</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.10.068" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.10.068</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    A new methodology to assess the performance and uncertainty of source apportionment models II: The results of two European intercomparison exercises

  • Original language description

    The performance and the uncertainty of receptor models (RMs) were assessed in intercomparison exercises employing real-world and synthetic input datasets. To that end, the results obtained by different practitioners using ten different RMs were comparedwith a reference. In order to explain the differences in the performances and uncertainties of the different approaches, the apportioned mass, the number of sources, the chemical profiles, the contribution-to-species and the time trends of the sources were all evaluated using the methodology described in Bells et al. (2015). In this study, 87% of the 344 source contribution estimates (SCEs) reported by participants in 47 different source apportionment model results met the 50% standard uncertainty quality objective established for the performance test. In addition, 68% of the SCE uncertainties reported in the results were coherent with the analytical uncertainties in the input data. The most used models, EPA-PMF v.3, PMF2 and EPA-CMB 8.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)

  • CEP classification

    DI - Pollution and air control

  • OECD FORD branch

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2015

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Atmospheric Environment

  • ISSN

    1352-2310

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    123

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    December 2015

  • Country of publishing house

    GB - UNITED KINGDOM

  • Number of pages

    11

  • Pages from-to

    240-250

  • UT code for WoS article

    000367498600025

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-84946709957