What flowers do we like? The influence of shape and color on the rating of flower beauty
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11310%2F16%3A10330879" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11310/16:10330879 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2106" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2106</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2106" target="_blank" >10.7717/peerj.2106</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
What flowers do we like? The influence of shape and color on the rating of flower beauty
Original language description
There is no doubt that people find flowers beautiful. Surprisingly, we know very little about the actual properties which make flowers so appealing to humans. Although the evolutionary aesthetics provides some theories concerning generally preferred flower traits, empirical evidence is largely missing. In this study, we used an online survey in which residents of the Czech Republic (n = 2006) rated the perceived beauty of 52 flower stimuli of diverse shapes and colors. Colored flowers were preferred over their uncolored versions. When controlling for flower shape, we found an unequal preference for different flower colors, blue being the most and yellow the least preferred. In the overall assessment of beauty, shape was more important than color. Prototypical flowers, i.e., radially symmetrical flowers with low complexity, were rated as the most beautiful. We also found a positive effect of sharp flower contours and blue color on the overall rating of flower beauty. The results may serve as a basis for further studies in some areas of the people-plant interaction research.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)
CEP classification
AN - Psychology
OECD FORD branch
—
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Others
Publication year
2016
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
PeerJ
ISSN
2167-8359
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
4
Issue of the periodical within the volume
4
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
29
Pages from-to
—
UT code for WoS article
000378026800005
EID of the result in the Scopus database
—