Philip Grime's fourth corner: are there plant species adapted to high disturbance and low productivity?
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11310%2F18%3A10388165" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11310/18:10388165 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/67985939:_____/18:00494864 RIV/00216224:14310/18:00101635
Result on the web
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.05090" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.05090</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/oik.05090" target="_blank" >10.1111/oik.05090</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Philip Grime's fourth corner: are there plant species adapted to high disturbance and low productivity?
Original language description
Grime's CSR species life-strategy theory (competition-stress-ruderality) provides a conceptual framework to classify species into competitive (growing under high productivity, low disturbance), stress-tolerant (low productivity, low disturbance) and ruderal (high productivity, high disturbance). Importantly, this classification is based on the assumption that the niche space of disturbance and productivity is filled unevenly: while in productive habitats species can adapt to different disturbance regimes, species of low-productivity and disturbed habitats do not exist, resulting in a triangular distribution of species optima along axes of disturbance and productivity. This assumption has often been criticised, but it has not yet been put under a rigorous test. Here we use existing data on niche positions of central European plant species to test this hypothesis, namely its prediction that species adapted to jointly stressed (low-productive) and disturbed habitats do not exist. We use Ellenberg indicator values and newly developed indicator values for disturbance as proxies of species positions in the space of productivity and disturbance. We found that positions of species optima along the gradients of productivity and disturbance severity are not independent of each other, with very few species adapted to low-productive and severely disturbed habitats. In contrast, there is no relationship between productivity and disturbance frequency; a number of species occur in low-productive and frequently disturbed habitats. The relationship between productivity and disturbance severity can be either due to tradeoffs between life history traits responsible for response to disturbance and productivity (as originally assumed by Grime) or due to historical rarity of severely disturbed habitats in unproductive conditions and consequent absence of evolution of species adapted to them. Our data are based on one specific flora, shaped by glaciations and early introduction of agriculture, but the question of what causes this pattern can be resolved by future analyses of floras with different evolutionary and ecological histories.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
10611 - Plant sciences, botany
Result continuities
Project
Result was created during the realization of more than one project. More information in the Projects tab.
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Others
Publication year
2018
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Oikos
ISSN
0030-1299
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
127
Issue of the periodical within the volume
8
Country of publishing house
DK - DENMARK
Number of pages
7
Pages from-to
1125-1131
UT code for WoS article
000440305800006
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85050806056