All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Bavarian Forest and Šumava National Parks: On the way to transboundary wildlife management and conservation?

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11310%2F20%3A10416436" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11310/20:10416436 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/00027073:_____/20:N0000075

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=QOGF1v~w_w" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=QOGF1v~w_w</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Bavarian Forest and Šumava National Parks: On the way to transboundary wildlife management and conservation?

  • Original language description

    Abstract The landscape of Central Europe has been shaped by humans for centuries. One of the less affected areas is the Bohemian Forest, located along the border of Germany (Bavaria), Austria, and Czechia. The Bohemian Forest ecosystem is protected as national parks in Bavaria and Czechia. Bavarian Forest and Šumava National Parks (NPs) together form one of the largest protected forested areas in Central Europe. However, both NPs differ in management, history and geography. Therefore, wildlife management measures (winter enclosures, feeding, hunting, law) were compared to reveal differences and similarities and red and roe deer densities were analysed as well. They represent abundant species with impact on vegetation. These measures are important for further harmonization of management. It is concluded that differences and obstacles for harmonization stem from a different legislation in both NPs, which causes that some measures cannot be applied in Šumava National Park in same way as in Bavarian Forest National Park, and it also stems from different development of management and nature protection in both NPs. On the other hand, there can be joint projects which can coordinate management. For example, the returning wolf (Canis lupus) is a good opportunity to enlarge transboundary non-intervention area.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>SC</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the SCOPUS database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10511 - Environmental sciences (social aspects to be 5.7)

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach<br>I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2020

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Silva Gabreta

  • ISSN

    1211-7420

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    26

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    May

  • Country of publishing house

    CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC

  • Number of pages

    13

  • Pages from-to

    51-63

  • UT code for WoS article

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85114184063