All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Assessing emergency situations and their aftermath in urban areas: The EMRAS II Urban Areas Working Group

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11320%2F11%3A10108142" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11320/11:10108142 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://www.radioprotection.org/index.php?option=com_article&access=doi&doi=10.1051/radiopro/20116528s&Itemid=129" target="_blank" >http://www.radioprotection.org/index.php?option=com_article&access=doi&doi=10.1051/radiopro/20116528s&Itemid=129</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/20116528s" target="_blank" >10.1051/radiopro/20116528s</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Assessing emergency situations and their aftermath in urban areas: The EMRAS II Urban Areas Working Group

  • Original language description

    The Urban Areas Working Group is part of the International Atomic Energy Agency's EMRAS II (Environmental Modelling for Radiation Safety) Programme. The goal of this Working Group is to test and improve the capabilities of models used in assessment of radioactive contamination in urban settings, including dispersion and deposition events, short- and long-term contaminant redistribution following deposition events, and potential countermeasures or remediation efforts for reducing human exposures and doses. The Working Group has developed three modeling exercises, which are designed to permit intercomparison of model predictions and, in one case, comparison of model predictions with measurements. This paper describes the scenarios and provides comparisons of initial modeling results. Reasons for similarities and discrepancies among model predictions are discussed in terms of the modeling approaches, models, and parameter values used by different assessors. Preliminary conclusions emphasi

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)

  • CEP classification

    DL - Nuclear waste, radioactive pollution and control

  • OECD FORD branch

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    Z - Vyzkumny zamer (s odkazem do CEZ)

Others

  • Publication year

    2011

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Radioprotection

  • ISSN

    0033-8451

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    46

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    6

  • Country of publishing house

    FR - FRANCE

  • Number of pages

    7

  • Pages from-to

    "S601"-"S607"

  • UT code for WoS article

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database