All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Handling Heap Data Structures in Backward Symbolic Execution

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11320%2F20%3A10397704" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11320/20:10397704 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54997-8_33" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54997-8_33</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54997-8_33" target="_blank" >10.1007/978-3-030-54997-8_33</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Handling Heap Data Structures in Backward Symbolic Execution

  • Original language description

    Backward symbolic execution (BSE), also known as weakest precondition computation, is a useful technique to determine validity of assertions in program code by transforming its semantics into boolean conditions for an SMT solver. Regrettably, the literature does not cover various challenges which arise during its implementation, especially when we want to reason about heap objects using the theory of arrays and to use the SMT solver efficiently. Our contribution is threefold. First, we summarize the two most popular state-of-the-art approaches used for BSE, denoting them as disjunct propagation and conjunction combination. Second, we present a novel method how to model heap operations in BSE using the theory of arrays, optimized for incremental checking during the analysis and handling the input heap. Third, we compare both approaches with our heap handling implementation on a set of program examples, presenting their strengths and weaknesses. The evaluation shows that the conjunction combination approach with incremental solving is the most efficient variant, exceeding straightforward implementation of disjunct propagation in an order of magnitude.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    D - Article in proceedings

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/GA17-12465S" target="_blank" >GA17-12465S: Verification and Bug Hunting for Advanced Software</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2020

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Article name in the collection

    Formal Methods. FM 2019 International Workshops

  • ISBN

    978-3-030-54997-8

  • ISSN

  • e-ISSN

  • Number of pages

    20

  • Pages from-to

    537-556

  • Publisher name

    Springer

  • Place of publication

    Cham

  • Event location

    Porto

  • Event date

    Oct 7, 2019

  • Type of event by nationality

    WRD - Celosvětová akce

  • UT code for WoS article