All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

CONSISTENCY OF CIRCUIT LOWER BOUNDS WITH BOUNDED THEORIES

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11320%2F20%3A10420835" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11320/20:10420835 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=RcpDf4ka5Z" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=RcpDf4ka5Z</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.23638/LMCS-16(2:12)2020" target="_blank" >10.23638/LMCS-16(2:12)2020</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    CONSISTENCY OF CIRCUIT LOWER BOUNDS WITH BOUNDED THEORIES

  • Original language description

    Proving that there are problems in P-NP that require boolean circuits of super-linear size is a major frontier in complexity theory. While such lower bounds are known for larger complexity classes, existing results only show that the corresponding problems are hard on infinitely many input lengths. For instance, proving almost-everywhere circuit lower bounds is open even for problems in MAEXP. Giving the notorious difficulty of proving lower bounds that hold for all large input lengths, we ask the following question: Can we show that a large set of techniques cannot prove that NP is easy infinitely often? Motivated by this and related questions about the interaction between mathematical proofs and computations, we investigate circuit complexity from the perspective of logic. Among other results, we prove that for any parameter k &gt;= 1 it is consistent with theory T that computational class C not subset of i.o.SIZE(n(k)), where (T, C) is one of the pairs: T=T-2(1) and C = P-NP , T=S-2(1) and C = NP, T = PV and C = P. In other words, these theories cannot establish infinitely often circuit upper bounds for the corresponding problems. This is of interest because the weaker theory PV already formalizes sophisticated arguments, such as a proof of the PCP Theorem [Pic15b]. These consistency statements are unconditional and improve on earlier theorems of [KO17] and [BM18] on the consistency of lower bounds with PV.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10101 - Pure mathematics

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2020

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Logical Methods in Computer Science

  • ISSN

    1860-5974

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    16

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    2

  • Country of publishing house

    DE - GERMANY

  • Number of pages

    16

  • Pages from-to

    12

  • UT code for WoS article

    000549432200010

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85087104274