All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Robustness Against Polarity Bias in Decoupled Group Recommendations Evaluation

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11320%2F22%3A10447497" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11320/22:10447497 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.1145/3511047.3537650" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1145/3511047.3537650</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3511047.3537650" target="_blank" >10.1145/3511047.3537650</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Robustness Against Polarity Bias in Decoupled Group Recommendations Evaluation

  • Original language description

    Group recommendations are a specific case of recommender systems (RS), where instead of recommending for each individual independently, shared recommendations are produced for groups of users. Usually, group recommendation techniques (i.e., group aggregators) are built on top of common &quot;single-user&quot;RS and the resulting group recommendation should reflect both the overall utility of the recommendation as well as fairness among the utilities of individual group members. Off-line evaluations of group recommendations were so far resolved either as a tightly coupled pair with the underlying RS or in a decoupled fashion. In the latter case, the relevance scores estimated by underlying RS serves as a ground truth for the evaluation of group aggregators. Both coupled and decoupled evaluation may suffer from different biases that provide illicit advantages to some classes of group recommending strategies. In this paper, we focus on the decoupled evaluation protocol and possible polarity bias of the underlying RS. We define polarity bias as situations when RS either locally or globally under-estimate or over-estimate the true user preferences. We propose several polarity de-biasing strategies and in the experimental part, we focus on the capability of group aggregation strategies to cope with the polarity biased input data.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    D - Article in proceedings

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/GA22-21696S" target="_blank" >GA22-21696S: Deep Visual Representations of Unstructured Data</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2022

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Article name in the collection

    UMAP2022 - Adjunct Proceedings of the 30th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization

  • ISBN

    978-1-4503-9232-7

  • ISSN

  • e-ISSN

  • Number of pages

    6

  • Pages from-to

    302-307

  • Publisher name

    Association for Computing Machinery

  • Place of publication

    New York, NY, United States

  • Event location

    Barcelona, Spain

  • Event date

    Jul 4, 2022

  • Type of event by nationality

    WRD - Celosvětová akce

  • UT code for WoS article