All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Challenges to Evaluating the Generalization of Coreference Resolution Models: A Measurement Modeling Perspective

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11320%2F25%3A4TNH2RWA" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11320/25:4TNH2RWA - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85205326133&partnerID=40&md5=3c6551d74b97e2c16eb35165302506a8" target="_blank" >https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85205326133&partnerID=40&md5=3c6551d74b97e2c16eb35165302506a8</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Challenges to Evaluating the Generalization of Coreference Resolution Models: A Measurement Modeling Perspective

  • Original language description

    It is increasingly common to evaluate the same coreference resolution (CR) model on multiple datasets. Do these multi-dataset evaluations allow us to draw meaningful conclusions about model generalization? Or, do they rather reflect the idiosyncrasies of a particular experimental setup (e.g., the specific datasets used)? To study this, we view evaluation through the lens of measurement modeling, a framework commonly used in the social sciences for analyzing the validity of measurements. By taking this perspective, we show how multi-dataset evaluations risk conflating different factors concerning what, precisely, is being measured. This in turn makes it difficult to draw more generalizable conclusions from these evaluations. For instance, we show that across seven datasets, measurements intended to reflect CR model generalization are often correlated with differences in both how coreference is defined and how it is operationalized; this limits our ability to draw conclusions regarding the ability of CR models to generalize across any singular dimension. We believe the measurement modeling framework provides the needed vocabulary for discussing challenges surrounding what is actually being measured by CR evaluations. © 2024 Association for Computational Linguistics.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    D - Article in proceedings

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

Others

  • Publication year

    2024

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Article name in the collection

    Proc. Annu. Meet. Assoc. Comput Linguist.

  • ISBN

    979-889176099-8

  • ISSN

    0736-587X

  • e-ISSN

  • Number of pages

    16

  • Pages from-to

    15380-15395

  • Publisher name

    Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)

  • Place of publication

  • Event location

    Hybrid, Bangkok

  • Event date

    Jan 1, 2025

  • Type of event by nationality

    WRD - Celosvětová akce

  • UT code for WoS article