All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Improving Latin Dependency Parsing by Combining Treebanks and Predictions

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11320%2F25%3AIHFX53EU" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11320/25:IHFX53EU - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85216580264&partnerID=40&md5=ef3021de3b5b84c97577b16b7f7d7772" target="_blank" >https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85216580264&partnerID=40&md5=ef3021de3b5b84c97577b16b7f7d7772</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Improving Latin Dependency Parsing by Combining Treebanks and Predictions

  • Original language description

    This paper introduces new models designed to improve the morpho-syntactic parsing of the five largest Latin treebanks in the Universal Dependencies (UD) framework.First, using two state-of-the-art parsers, Trankit and Stanza, along with our custom UD tagger, we train new models on the five treebanks both individually and by combining them into novel merged datasets.We also test the models on the CIRCSE test set.In an additional experiment, we evaluate whether this set can be accurately tagged using the novel LASLA corpus (https://github.com/CIRCSE/LASLA).Second, we aim to improve the results by combining the predictions of different models through an atomic morphological feature voting system.The results of our two main experiments demonstrate significant improvements, particularly for the smaller treebanks, with LAS scores increasing by 16.10 and 11.85%-points for UDante and Perseus, respectively (Gamba and Zeman, 2023a).Additionally, the voting system for morphological features (FEATS) brings improvements, especially for the smaller Latin treebanks: Perseus 3.15% and CIRCSE 2.47%-points.Tagging the CIRCSE set with our custom model using the LASLA model improves POS 6.71 and FEATS 11.04%-points compared to our best-performing UD PROIEL model.Our results show that larger datasets and ensemble predictions can significantly improve performance. © 2024 Association for Computational Linguistics.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    D - Article in proceedings

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

Others

  • Publication year

    2024

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Article name in the collection

    NLP4DH - Int. Conf. Nat. Lang. Process. Digit. Humanit., Proc. Conf.

  • ISBN

    979-889176181-0

  • ISSN

  • e-ISSN

  • Number of pages

    13

  • Pages from-to

    216-228

  • Publisher name

    Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)

  • Place of publication

  • Event location

    Miami

  • Event date

    Jan 1, 2025

  • Type of event by nationality

    WRD - Celosvětová akce

  • UT code for WoS article