Polarity reversal constructions and counterfactuals in Ancient Greek: Between implicature and conventionalization
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11320%2F25%3ATF94TBTE" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11320/25:TF94TBTE - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85187689585&doi=10.1075%2fjhl.22048.lar&partnerID=40&md5=0b0ce233163fce715f7a2d0a3a11e92c" target="_blank" >https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85187689585&doi=10.1075%2fjhl.22048.lar&partnerID=40&md5=0b0ce233163fce715f7a2d0a3a11e92c</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/jhl.22048.lar" target="_blank" >10.1075/jhl.22048.lar</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Polarity reversal constructions and counterfactuals in Ancient Greek: Between implicature and conventionalization
Original language description
Polarity reversal has recently been argued to be the defining characteristic of counterfactuality. Ancient Greek had a diverse set of constructions which bring about polarity reversal that is not the direct result of a negation marker nor do they all express a counterfactual meaning. It is the aim of this paper to detail the major differences between these constructions synchronically and especially diachronically, focusing on counterfactual mood forms, counterfactual modal verbs, avertives (almost+past (im)perfective), non-counterfactual rhetorical questions and non-standard wishes. As a historically varied constructional group, these constructions bring about polarity reversal in different ways with different implicatures (e.g., counterfactual, contradictory, undesirable), but they most importantly differ in their diachronic conventionalization of polarity reversal. Whereas counterfactuals conventionalize their polarity reversal in various ways (e.g., changing temporal reference, counterfactual implicature transfer), non-counterfactual polarity reversal constructions create polarity reversal as a synchronic implicature through pragmatic means (e.g., a rhetorical question identifying a contradictory presupposition in the common ground or a non-standard wish evaluating an undesirable outcome to the speaker). © John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>SC</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the SCOPUS database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
—
Others
Publication year
2024
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Journal of Historical Linguistics
ISSN
22102116
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
14
Issue of the periodical within the volume
2
Country of publishing house
US - UNITED STATES
Number of pages
41
Pages from-to
335 - 375
UT code for WoS article
—
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85187689585