All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Evaluating Shortest Edit Script Methods for Contextual Lemmatization

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11320%2F25%3AWIM5NMF7" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11320/25:WIM5NMF7 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85195900992&partnerID=40&md5=401cb8d206a86df3d216eca173ba5ffa" target="_blank" >https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85195900992&partnerID=40&md5=401cb8d206a86df3d216eca173ba5ffa</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Evaluating Shortest Edit Script Methods for Contextual Lemmatization

  • Original language description

    Modern contextual lemmatizers often rely on automatically induced Shortest Edit Scripts (SES), namely, the number of edit operations to transform a word form into its lemma. In fact, different methods of computing SES have been proposed as an integral component in the architecture of several state-of-the-art contextual lemmatizers currently available. However, previous work has not investigated the direct impact of SES in the final lemmatization performance. In this paper we address this issue by focusing on lemmatization as a token classification task where the only input that the model receives is the word-label pairs in context, where the labels correspond to previously induced SES. Thus, by modifying in our lemmatization system only the SES labels that the model needs to learn, we may then objectively conclude which SES representation produces the best lemmatization results. We experiment with seven languages of different morphological complexity, namely, English, Spanish, Basque, Russian, Czech, Turkish and Polish, using multilingual and language-specific pre-trained masked language encoder-only models as a backbone to build our lemmatizers. Comprehensive experimental results, both in- and out-of-domain, indicate that computing the casing and edit operations separately is beneficial overall, but much more clearly for languages with high-inflected morphology. Notably, multilingual pre-trained language models consistently outperform their language-specific counterparts in every evaluation setting. © 2024 ELRA Language Resource Association: CC BY-NC 4.0.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    D - Article in proceedings

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

Others

  • Publication year

    2024

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Article name in the collection

    Jt. Int. Conf. Comput. Linguist., Lang. Resour. Eval., LREC-COLING - Main Conf. Proc.

  • ISBN

    978-249381410-4

  • ISSN

  • e-ISSN

  • Number of pages

    13

  • Pages from-to

    6451-6463

  • Publisher name

    European Language Resources Association (ELRA)

  • Place of publication

  • Event location

    Torino, Italia

  • Event date

    Jan 1, 2025

  • Type of event by nationality

    WRD - Celosvětová akce

  • UT code for WoS article