The Integrated Plant Record (IPR) analysis: Methodological advances and new insights into the evolution of European Palaeogene/Neogene vegetation
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11410%2F20%3A10410156" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11410/20:10410156 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=ifysS1vU5" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=ifysS1vU5</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.26879/1055" target="_blank" >10.26879/1055</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
The Integrated Plant Record (IPR) analysis: Methodological advances and new insights into the evolution of European Palaeogene/Neogene vegetation
Original language description
The Integrated Plant Record (IPR) vegetation analysis serves as a proxy method to derive major types of zonal palaeovegetation based on the proportion of zonal key components. This paper pursues two goals: 1) to introduce two tools (Drudge 1 and Drudge 2) to statistically determine lose modern proxies for fossil plant assemblages out of the reference set of currently 505 modern vegetation units. These range from closed forests to more open (steppe) environments from Europe and Asia and are based on the correspondence in the proportion of the zonal key components (IPR Similarity) and Taxonomic Similarity (TS, genus level); and 2) to present the extension of the calibration dataset of modern zonal vegetation using the natural vegetation of Europe, the Caucasus, China, and Mongolia. The tools are tested on six Central European plant assemblages from the late Eocene to the late Pliocene. For the late Eocene to early Miocene, the results indicate a close relationship to East Asian vegetation based both on IPR Similarity and TS. For the younger sites, IPR Similarity points towards European vegetation, whereas TS still indicates closer East Asian affinity. The summary results (as presented in the Results - Mix) derived by both tools deliver modern proxy vegetation units, which are in good agreement with modern vegetation analogues proposed by traditional empirical studies. The IPR Similarity results probably reflect climate change, which results in proportions of zonal key components, i.e., leaf physiognomy of zonal forests that are more similar to modern European than to Asian vegetation from the latest early/middle Miocene onwards.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
10505 - Geology
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/GA18-25057S" target="_blank" >GA18-25057S: Quantifying openness of vegetation by the Integrated Plant Record vegetation analysis</a><br>
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Others
Publication year
2020
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Palaeontologia Electronica [online]
ISSN
1094-8074
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
23
Issue of the periodical within the volume
1
Country of publishing house
US - UNITED STATES
Number of pages
19
Pages from-to
1-19
UT code for WoS article
000530859100016
EID of the result in the Scopus database
—