All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Differences in kinematics of the support limb depends on specific movement tasks of take-off

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11510%2F16%3A10329665" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11510/16:10329665 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5507/ag.2016.005" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.5507/ag.2016.005</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5507/ag.2016.005" target="_blank" >10.5507/ag.2016.005</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Differences in kinematics of the support limb depends on specific movement tasks of take-off

  • Original language description

    Background: Many sport activities are a sequence of jumps (running, jumping, hurdling etc.). Each jump flight phase is the result of the execution of the previous support phase. Objective: The goal of the research was to identify differences in adjustment of the support lower limb and differences in take-off kinematics in specific take-off movement task. Methods: 14 male athletes (22.6 +- 4.4 years; 182.4 +- 5.3 cm; 74.7 +- 6.2 kg) took part in a laboratory experiment. Each athlete performed five different take-off movements (running, acceleration running - second step, long jump take-off, high jump take-off and take-off to the hurdle). System Qualisys was used to analyze the kinematics of the support limb. Dynamics of the support phase was monitored via force plate. ANOVA and Bonferroni post-hoc test were used to measure the significance of the differences between different take off tasks. Results: Dynamic characteristic showed significant differences in take-off (p < .001). This variability is caused by differences in kinematic parameters at the instant of touch-down, minimum joint angles and take-off. The most important finding was different variability in range of motion in eccentric or concentric phases of each jump. Vertically orientated jumps are terminated in a higher degree of extension. Horizontal take-off types are characterized by the highest ranges of motion especially in the ankle joint. Conclusions: The support lower limb compliance is adjusted to the required task, which is related to lower limb kinematics during the support phase. High range of motion in each joint refers to more compliant adjustment of the joint.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)

  • CEP classification

    AK - Sport and leisure time activities

  • OECD FORD branch

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2016

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Acta Gymnica

  • ISSN

    2336-4912

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    46

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    2

  • Country of publishing house

    CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC

  • Number of pages

    8

  • Pages from-to

    82-89

  • UT code for WoS article

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-84978963493