Attachment styles and clinical correlates in people at ultra high risk for psychosis
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11510%2F17%3A10370214" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11510/17:10370214 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12249" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12249</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12249" target="_blank" >10.1111/bjop.12249</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Attachment styles and clinical correlates in people at ultra high risk for psychosis
Original language description
Evidence suggests that attachment styles may influence subclinical psychosis phenotypes (schizotypy) and affective disorders and may play a part in the association between psychosis and childhood adversity. However, the role of attachment in the initial stages of psychosis remains poorly understood. Our main aim was to describe and compare attachment styles in 60 individuals at ultra high risk for psychosis (UHR) and a matched sample of 60 healthy volunteers (HV). The HV had lower anxious and avoidant attachment scores than the UHR individuals (p < .001). Sixty-nine percentage of the UHR group had more than one DSM-IV diagnosis, mainly affective and anxiety disorders. The UHR group experienced more trauma (p < .001) and more mood and anxiety symptoms (p < .001). Interestingly, in our UHR group, only schizotypy paranoia was correlated with insecure attachment. In the HV group, depression, anxiety, schizotypy paranoia, and social anxiety were correlated with insecure attachment. This difference and some discrepancies with previous studies involving UHR suggest that individuals at UHR may compose a heterogeneous group; some experience significant mood and/or anxiety symptoms that may not be explained by specific attachment styles. Nonetheless, measuring attachment in UHR individuals could help maximize therapeutic relationships to enhance recovery.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30215 - Psychiatry
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2017
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
British Journal of Psychology
ISSN
0007-1269
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
109
Issue of the periodical within the volume
1
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
18
Pages from-to
45-62
UT code for WoS article
000419235900004
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85018762106