All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Predatory publishing in Scopus: evidence on cross-country differences

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11640%2F21%3A00542241" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11640/21:00542241 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03852-4" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03852-4</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03852-4" target="_blank" >10.1007/s11192-020-03852-4</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Predatory publishing in Scopus: evidence on cross-country differences

  • Original language description

    Predatory publishing represents a major challenge to scholarly communication. This paper maps the infiltration of journals suspected of predatory practices into the citation database Scopus and examines cross-country differences in the propensity of scholars to publish in such journals. Using the names of “potential, possible, or probable” predatory journals and publishers on Beall’s lists, we derived the ISSNs of 3,293 journals from Ulrichsweb and searched Scopus with them. 324 of journals that appear both in Beall’s lists and Scopus with 164 thousand articles published over 2015–2017 were identified. Analysis of data for 172 countries in 4 fields of research indicates that there is a remarkable heterogeneity. In the most affected countries, including Kazakhstan and Indonesia, around 17% of articles fall into the predatory category, while some other countries have no predatory articles whatsoever. Countries with large research sectors at the medium level of economic development, especially in Asia and North Africa, tend to be most susceptible to predatory publishing. Arab, oil-rich and/or eastern countries also appear to be particularly vulnerable. Policymakers and stakeholders in these and other developing countries need to pay more attention to the quality of research evaluation.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50803 - Information science (social aspects)

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/GA17-09265S" target="_blank" >GA17-09265S: Frontiers of empirical research on public financing of business R&D and innovation</a><br>

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2021

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Scientometrics

  • ISSN

    0138-9130

  • e-ISSN

    1588-2861

  • Volume of the periodical

    126

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    3

  • Country of publishing house

    NL - THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS

  • Number of pages

    25

  • Pages from-to

    1897-1921

  • UT code for WoS article

    000615755400001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85100556071