All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Angreement on intrapartum cardiotocogram recordings between expert obstetricians

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14110%2F15%3A00083295" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14110/15:00083295 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jep.12368" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jep.12368</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jep.12368" target="_blank" >10.1111/jep.12368</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Angreement on intrapartum cardiotocogram recordings between expert obstetricians

  • Original language description

    Rationale, aims and objectives To evaluate obstetricians? inter- and intra-observer agreement on intrapartum cardiotocogram (CTG) recordings and to examine obstetricians? evaluations with respect to umbilical artery pH and base deficit. Methods Nine experienced obstetricians annotated 634 intrapartum CTG recordings. The evaluation of each recording was divided into four steps: evaluation of two 30- minute windows in the first stage of labour, evaluation of one window in the second stage of labour and labour outcome prediction. The complete set of evaluations used for this experiment is available online. The inter- and intra-observer agreement was evaluated using proportion of agreement and kappa coefficient. Clinicians? sensitivity and specificity wascomputed with respect to umbilical artery pH, base deficit and to Apgar score at the fifth minute. Results The overall proportion of agreement between clinicians reached 48% with 95% confidence intervals (CI) (CI: 47?50).

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)

  • CEP classification

    FK - Gynaecology and obstetrics

  • OECD FORD branch

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2015

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practise

  • ISSN

    1356-1294

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    21

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    4

  • Country of publishing house

    GB - UNITED KINGDOM

  • Number of pages

    9

  • Pages from-to

    694-702

  • UT code for WoS article

    000358693200021

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database