Volumetric analysis versus response evaluation criteria in solid tumors and modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors in the evaluation of HCC after transarterial chemoembolization
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14110%2F16%3A00092221" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14110/16:00092221 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="http://paperity.org/p/76277811/esgar-2016-book-of-abstracts" target="_blank" >http://paperity.org/p/76277811/esgar-2016-book-of-abstracts</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-016-0502-9" target="_blank" >10.1007/s13244-016-0502-9</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Volumetric analysis versus response evaluation criteria in solid tumors and modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors in the evaluation of HCC after transarterial chemoembolization
Original language description
Purpose of this study is to compare volumetric analysis with the standard criteria - response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) and modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (mRECIST) - for the evaluation of HCC and its response to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). The total of 40 patients was included in the study. Volumetric analysis was statistically proven the strongest factor of the correlation with the length of the survival of the patients, contrary to RECIST and mRECIST. It is a convenient way to evaluate the response of HCC to treatment, particularly in complex tumors after TACE.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
O - Miscellaneous
CEP classification
FP - Other medical fields
OECD FORD branch
—
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Others
Publication year
2016
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů