All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

How to govern the digital transformation of health services

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14110%2F19%3A00112630" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14110/19:00112630 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckz165" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckz165</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckz165" target="_blank" >10.1093/eurpub/ckz165</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    How to govern the digital transformation of health services

  • Original language description

    The impact of digitalization of health services has been profound and is expected to be even more profound in the future. It is important to evaluate whether digital health services contribute to health system goals in an optimal way. This should be done at the level of the service, not the 'digital transformation'. Decisions to adopt new digital health services, at different levels of the health care system, are ideally based on evidence regarding their performance in light of health system goals. In order to evaluate this, a broad perspective should be taken in evaluations of digital health services. Attainment of the broad health system goals, including quality, efficiency and equity, are objectives against which to judge new digital health services. These goals in a broad sense are unaltered by the process of digitalization. Governance should be designed and tailored in such a way to capture all relevant changes in an adequate way. When evaluating digital health services many specific aspects need to be considered. Like for other innovations and (new) technologies, such promises may or may not materialize and potential benefits may also be accompanied by unintended and/or negative (side) effects in the short or long term. Hence, the introduction, implementation, use and funding of digital health technologies should be carefully evaluated and monitored. Governments should play a more active role in the further optimization both of the process of decision making (both at the central and decentral level) and the related outcomes. They need to find a balance between centralized and decentralized activity. Moreover, the broader preparation of the health care system to be able to deal with digitalization, from education, through financial and regulatory preconditions, to implementation of monitoring systems to monitor its effects on health system performance remains important.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    30304 - Public and environmental health

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2019

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    European journal of public health

  • ISSN

    1101-1262

  • e-ISSN

    1464-360X

  • Volume of the periodical

    29

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    OCT 2019

  • Country of publishing house

    GB - UNITED KINGDOM

  • Number of pages

    6

  • Pages from-to

    7-12

  • UT code for WoS article

    000501730200003

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85075200777