Measurement Invariance of the Meaning in Life Questionnaire Across 17 Countries
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14110%2F23%3A00130558" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14110/23:00130558 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11482-023-10150-7" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11482-023-10150-7</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11482-023-10150-7" target="_blank" >10.1007/s11482-023-10150-7</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Measurement Invariance of the Meaning in Life Questionnaire Across 17 Countries
Original language description
The Meaning in Life Questionnaire assesses presence of and search for meaning in life. Although the questionnaire has shown promising psychometric properties in samples from different countries, the scale’s measurement invariance across a large number of nations has yet to be assessed. This study is aimed at addressing this gap, providing insight into how meaning in life is constructed and experienced across countries and into the extent to which cross-country comparisons can be made. A total of 3867 adult participants from 17 countries, aged 30–60, balanced by gender, and with at least secondary education, completed the questionnaire as part of the Eudaimonic and Hedonic Happiness Investigation. Single sample confirmatory factor analysis, multigroup confirmatory factor analysis, and alignment optimization were applied to investigate the scale’s performance across the samples. Good psychometric properties and high levels of approximate measurement invariance emerged for the Presence subscale after removal of item 9, the only reverse-phrased item. Performance of the Search subscale varied more across samples, suggesting caution in interpreting related results supporting approximate measurement invariance. The conceptualization of presence of meaning operationalized in the corresponding subscale (without item 9) appears consistent across countries, whereas search for meaning seems to be less universally homogenous and requires further exploration. Moreover, the Meaning in Life Questionnaire does not reflect the conceptual distinction between “purpose” and “meaning” currently acknowledged by researchers. This issue should be further explored in studies addressing the scale’s performance across cultures.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
50101 - Psychology (including human - machine relations)
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2023
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Applied Research in Quality of Life
ISSN
1871-2584
e-ISSN
1871-2576
Volume of the periodical
18
Issue of the periodical within the volume
3
Country of publishing house
NL - THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS
Number of pages
29
Pages from-to
1491-1519
UT code for WoS article
000989363600002
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85151422558