Revising the JBI quantitative critical appraisal tools to improve their applicability: an overview of methods and the development process
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14110%2F23%3A00133389" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14110/23:00133389 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://journals.lww.com/jbisrir/fulltext/2023/03000/revising_the_jbi_quantitative_critical_appraisal.4.aspx" target="_blank" >https://journals.lww.com/jbisrir/fulltext/2023/03000/revising_the_jbi_quantitative_critical_appraisal.4.aspx</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-22-00125" target="_blank" >10.11124/JBIES-22-00125</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Revising the JBI quantitative critical appraisal tools to improve their applicability: an overview of methods and the development process
Original language description
JBI offers a suite of critical appraisal instruments that are freely available to systematic reviewers and researchers investigating the methodological limitations of primary research studies. The JBI instruments are designed to be study-specific and are presented as questions in a checklist. The JBI instruments have existed in a checklist-style format for approximately 20 years; however, as the field of research synthesis expands, many of the tools offered by JBI have become outdated. The JBI critical appraisal tools for quantitative studies (eg, randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies) must be updated to reflect the current methodologies in this field. Cognizant of this and the recent developments in risk-of-bias science, the JBI Effectiveness Methodology Group was tasked with updating the current quantitative critical appraisal instruments. This paper details the methods and rationale that the JBI Effectiveness Methodology Group followed when updating the JBI critical appraisal instruments for quantitative study designs. We detail the key changes made to the tools and highlight how these changes reflect current methodological developments in this field.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30230 - Other clinical medicine subjects
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/LTC20031" target="_blank" >LTC20031: Towards an International Network for Evidence-based Research in Clinical Health Research in the Czech Republic</a><br>
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Others
Publication year
2023
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
JBI Evidence Synthesis
ISSN
2689-8381
e-ISSN
2689-8381
Volume of the periodical
21
Issue of the periodical within the volume
3
Country of publishing house
US - UNITED STATES
Number of pages
16
Pages from-to
478-493
UT code for WoS article
000945987900004
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85144956229