Is Transparent Intensional Logic a Logic?
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14210%2F12%3A00061129" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14210/12:00061129 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Is Transparent Intensional Logic a Logic?
Original language description
The aim of the talk is to defend Tichý's logic as logic againt the suspeiction that Tichý's logic underestimates deduction, provides only logical analyses of expressions. First of all, detection of valid arguments, which are formulated in a language, needs logical analysis ascertaining which semantical entities, Tichý's so-called constructions, are involved. Entailment is defined as an extralinguistic affair relating those constructions. Validity of arguments, composed of propositional constructions, stems from properties of constructions. Such properties are displayed by derivation rules of Tichý's system of deduction.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
O - Miscellaneous
CEP classification
AA - Philosophy and religion
OECD FORD branch
—
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Others
Publication year
2012
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů