Rhetorical effectiveness of (quasi) logical design of arguments
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14210%2F15%3A00083426" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14210/15:00083426 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="http://www.retoryka.edu.pl/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=62&Itemid=66&lang=pl" target="_blank" >http://www.retoryka.edu.pl/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=62&Itemid=66&lang=pl</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Rhetorical effectiveness of (quasi) logical design of arguments
Original language description
According to Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca scientific audience tends to be influenced by argumentation presented as following logically or being demonstrative. The paper examines a rhetorical effectiveness of so-called quasi-logical arguments introducedinto theory of argumentation by New Rhetoric programme. This paper interconnects this perspective with pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. It examines quasi-logical arguments by concept of strategic maneuvering that is considered as an attempt ofspeakers to strengthen rhetorical effectiveness of arguments but simultaneously not to weaken their dialectical soundness. The paper investigates ?quasi-logicality? as a type of strategic maneuvering. The analysis is presented on particular case of twosub-types of quasi-logical arguments: reciprocity and rule of justice. Speech acts theory and concept of felicity conditions is used for research of rhetorical effectiveness of topical choice of these argument schemes.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
O - Miscellaneous
CEP classification
AA - Philosophy and religion
OECD FORD branch
—
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Others
Publication year
2015
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů