All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Paradigms and self-reference: what is the point of asserting paradoxical sentences?

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14210%2F20%3A00113970" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14210/20:00113970 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-27569-3_9" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-27569-3_9</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27569-3_9" target="_blank" >10.1007/978-3-030-27569-3_9</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Paradigms and self-reference: what is the point of asserting paradoxical sentences?

  • Original language description

    A paradox, according to Wittgenstein, is something surprising that is taken out of its context. Thus, one way of dealing with paradoxical sentences is to imagine the missing context of use. Wittgenstein formulates what I call the paradigm paradox: ‘one sentence can never describe the paradigm in another, unless it ceases to be a paradigm.’ (PG, p.346) There are several instances of this paradox scattered throughout Wittgenstein’s writings. I argue that this paradox is structurally equivalent to Russell’s paradox. The above quotation is Wittgenstein’s version of the vicious circle principle which counteracts the paradox. The prohibition Wittgenstein describes is, however, limited to a certain language-game. Finally, I argue that there is a structural analogy between a noun being employed as a self-membered set and a paradigmatic sample being included in or excluded from the set it generates. Paradoxical sentences are not prohibited forever; they can indicate a change in our praxis with a given paradigm.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    C - Chapter in a specialist book

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/GA19-16680S" target="_blank" >GA19-16680S: Paradigmatic thinking: singularity, universality, self-reference</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2020

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Book/collection name

    Wittgensteinian (adj.): Looking at the World from the Viewpoint of Wittgenstein's Philosophy

  • ISBN

    9783030275686

  • Number of pages of the result

    12

  • Pages from-to

    123-134

  • Number of pages of the book

    560

  • Publisher name

    Springer

  • Place of publication

    Cham, Switzerland

  • UT code for WoS chapter

    000630349000011