All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Hegel and Wittgenstein on Difficulties of Beginning at the Beginning

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14210%2F22%3A00129239" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14210/22:00129239 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11245-022-09797-y" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11245-022-09797-y</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11245-022-09797-y" target="_blank" >10.1007/s11245-022-09797-y</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Hegel and Wittgenstein on Difficulties of Beginning at the Beginning

  • Original language description

    Both Hegel and the later Wittgenstein were concerned with the problem of how to begin speculation, or the problem of beginning. I argue that despite many differences, there are surprising similarities between their thinking about the beginning. They both consider different kinds of beginnings and combine them into complex analogies. The beginning has a subjective and an objective moment. The philosophizing subject has to begin with something, with an object. For Hegel, the objective moment is pure being. For Wittgenstein, the objective moment is something that cannot be doubted. As regards the subjective moment, the philosophizing subject has to decide, without any reason, to conclude her quest for the presuppositionless beginning and finally begin at the beginning. The arational moment of this decision is echoed throughout any rational thought. Any application of a (rational) rule is, ultimately, a blind decision to apply this rule.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/GA19-16680S" target="_blank" >GA19-16680S: Paradigmatic thinking: singularity, universality, self-reference</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2022

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Topoi

  • ISSN

    0167-7411

  • e-ISSN

    1572-8749

  • Volume of the periodical

    41

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    5

  • Country of publishing house

    NL - THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS

  • Number of pages

    15

  • Pages from-to

    939-953

  • UT code for WoS article

    000795606200001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85130117989