All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Iterative/semelfactive = collective/singulative? Parallels in Slavic

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14210%2F25%3A00141816" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14210/25:00141816 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/languages10090203" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.3390/languages10090203</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/languages10090203" target="_blank" >10.3390/languages10090203</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Iterative/semelfactive = collective/singulative? Parallels in Slavic

  • Original language description

    In this paper, I will discuss a topic concerning part–whole structures in the nominal and verbal domain. Specifically, I will address the question of whether there is a universal mechanism for the individuation of entities and events by exploring parallels between singulatives and semelfactives in Slavic. Singulatives are derived unit nouns, whereas semelfactives are punctual verbs that describe a brief event which culminates by returning to the initial state. Cross-linguistically, singulative morphology often alternates with collective marking, whereas semelfactives alternate with iteratives. Collectives and iteratives describe homogenous groupings of entities and events, respectively. From a conceptual perspective, both singulatives and semelfactives individuate to the effect of singular bounded unit reference and in the literature, the parallel between the mass count/distinction and aspect has often been drawn. In Slavic, singulative and semelfactive morphologies share a component; specifically, both markers involve a nasal -N and a vocalic component, e.g., compare Russian gorox ‘peas (as a mass)’ ∼ goroš-IN-a ‘a pea’ and prygat’ ‘to jump (repeatedly)’ ∼ pryg-NU-t’ ‘to jump once’. I will argue that the singulative -IN and semelfactive -NU are complex and both involve the very same -N, which denotes a declustering atomizer modeled in mereotopological terms.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    60203 - Linguistics

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/EH23_025%2F0008726" target="_blank" >EH23_025/0008726: A lifetime with language: the nature and ontogeny of linguistic communication (LangInLife)</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2025

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Languages

  • ISSN

    2226-471X

  • e-ISSN

    2226-471X

  • Volume of the periodical

    10

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    9

  • Country of publishing house

    CH - SWITZERLAND

  • Number of pages

    36

  • Pages from-to

    1-36

  • UT code for WoS article

    001581336300001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-105017433832