All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Purism and nationalism in language norms : A comparative analysis of the Norwegian and Slovak spelling reform adopted during World War II

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14210%2F25%3A00143345" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14210/25:00143345 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://reference-global.com/article/10.2478/jazcas-2025-0040?tab=preview" target="_blank" >https://reference-global.com/article/10.2478/jazcas-2025-0040?tab=preview</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/jazcas-2025-0040" target="_blank" >10.2478/jazcas-2025-0040</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Purism and nationalism in language norms : A comparative analysis of the Norwegian and Slovak spelling reform adopted during World War II

  • Original language description

    The linguistic situation in interwar Norway and Czechoslovakia had several parallels. The official languages in both countries were represented by two written standards: Norwegian in the form of Bokmål and Nynorsk, and, in Czechoslovakia, Czech and Slovak – separate but closely related languages that were officially referred to as the Czechoslovak language. At the same time, both countries adopted spelling norms during this period to gradually unify the language variants into one. In Norway, this process took the form of a mutual approximation of Bokmål and Nynorsk, while in Czechoslovakia, it primarily involved bringing Slovak closer to Czech. Both the Norwegian spelling reform of 1938 and the Rules of Slovak Orthography of 1931 caused controversy. Moreover, in both cases, the new rules were adopted during the Second World War, at a time when both Norway and the newly established Slovak Republic were Nazi Germany’s allies. This article focuses on the impact of political changes on spelling reforms and, through comparative analysis, seeks to identify the elements, approaches, or ideas that may connect the new rules despite the different linguistic natures of the analysed languages.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>SC</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the SCOPUS database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    60203 - Linguistics

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Others

  • Publication year

    2025

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    JAZYKOVEDNÝ ČASOPIS

  • ISSN

    0021-5597

  • e-ISSN

    1338-4287

  • Volume of the periodical

    76

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    2

  • Country of publishing house

    SK - SLOVAKIA

  • Number of pages

    16

  • Pages from-to

    493-508

  • UT code for WoS article

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-105027669537