All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

“M. Leibnits étoit un grand homme” : The role of argument from epistemic authority in Du Châtelet's dispute with Mairan

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14210%2F25%3A00144427" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14210/25:00144427 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/sjp.12633" target="_blank" >https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/sjp.12633</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sjp.12633" target="_blank" >10.1111/sjp.12633</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    “M. Leibnits étoit un grand homme” : The role of argument from epistemic authority in Du Châtelet's dispute with Mairan

  • Original language description

    In my article, I propose to analyze the Du Châtelet-Mairan dispute from the perspective of the modern theory of argumentation, focusing on the study of arguments from authority. I study separately the opinions of Du Châtelet and Mairan on the correct use of the argument from authority (Is the opponent using the argument correctly? Which part of the argumentation is questionable?) and their views on the argument itself (Is the argument from authority relevant in the dispute?). I aim to show that the two opponents transformed the theme of epistemic authority into one of the main issues of their dispute. I argue that both Du Châtelet and Mairan were careful about arguments from authority in scientific argumentations and question the possible shortcomings of the argument.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/GA23-05587S" target="_blank" >GA23-05587S: Philosophical Legitimation of Science in the Early Enlightenment: Fontenelle and His Contemporaries</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2025

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    The Southern Journal of Philosophy

  • ISSN

    0038-4283

  • e-ISSN

    2041-6962

  • Volume of the periodical

    63

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    2

  • Country of publishing house

    US - UNITED STATES

  • Number of pages

    13

  • Pages from-to

    211-223

  • UT code for WoS article

    001494498900001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-105006814404