The Pitfall of Interpreting Rome II Regulation Consistently with Brussels I Regulation

Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F09%3A00029505" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/09:00029505 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—

Result language
angličtina
Original language name
The Pitfall of Interpreting Rome II Regulation Consistently with Brussels I Regulation
Original language description
This article addresses several aspects of interaction between procedural and conflict rule regulation in private international law both of which are subject to unification process under the European Community law. They are interdependent of each other, and use the same or similar terms on many occasions. Problems with interpretation arise in application of these legal regulations. The European Court of Justice addresses them more or less successfully. As demonstrated in this article, the interpretationof procedural rules of regulation may contribute to the clarification of the conflict rules and vice versa. It can be even said that the mutual interaction of conflict rules and procedural rules through interpretation is both unavoidable and desirable.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—

Type
J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)
CEP classification
AG - Legal sciences
OECD FORD branch
—

Project
<a href="/en/project/GP407%2F08%2FP624" target="_blank" >GP407/08/P624: Delicts/Torts from the perspective of the private international law</a><br>
Continuities
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Publication year
2009
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Similar results(10)