Expert inquiry as evidence in Czech criminal proceedings
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F13%3A00066214" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/13:00066214 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Expert inquiry as evidence in Czech criminal proceedings
Original language description
The article deals with the fundamentals differences between specialist statement and experts opinion. It points to when during criminal proceedings experts opinion should be done and when is sufficient only specialist knowledge and what criteria has to be respected during it. It intends why it is necessary to give attention to selection of expert, exact wording of questions and what all should be respected during the evaluation of experts opinion or what all can influence its quality.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
D - Article in proceedings
CEP classification
AG - Legal sciences
OECD FORD branch
—
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/GAP408%2F12%2F0163" target="_blank" >GAP408/12/0163: Evidence in Pre-Trial Proceedings</a><br>
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Others
Publication year
2013
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Article name in the collection
Criminalistics and Forensic Examination: Science, Studies and Practice
ISBN
9789986555391
ISSN
—
e-ISSN
—
Number of pages
10
Pages from-to
97-106
Publisher name
Vydavniča Agencija "Apostiľ"
Place of publication
Kharkov, Ukrajina
Event location
Vilnius
Event date
Jun 21, 2013
Type of event by nationality
EUR - Evropská akce
UT code for WoS article
—