Inclusion before Exclusion or Vice Versa: What the Qualification Directive and the Court of Justice Do (Not) Say

Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F13%3A00067478" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/13:00067478 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eet004" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eet004</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eet004" target="_blank" >10.1093/ijrl/eet004</a>

Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Inclusion before Exclusion or Vice Versa: What the Qualification Directive and the Court of Justice Do (Not) Say
Original language description
The question whether the assessment of the inclusion clause must precede the application of the exclusion clauses under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees (CSR51) is a recurring theme in many jurisdictions. This article shows that thejurisprudence of the top national courts shifted decisively in favour of the ´exclusion before inclusion? position. Subsequently, this article looks for guidance at the Qualification and Procedures Directives. It claims that although it is generally assumed that the European Asylum Acquis left this issue untouched, it endorses the ´exclusion before inclusion? position and it does so even more overtly than the CSR51.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—

Type
J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)
CEP classification
AG - Legal sciences
OECD FORD branch
—

Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Publication year
2013
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Similar results(10)