The Least Accountable Branch

Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F13%3A00067499" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/13:00067499 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icon/mos056" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icon/mos056</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icon/mos056" target="_blank" >10.1093/icon/mos056</a>

Result language
angličtina
Original language name
The Least Accountable Branch
Original language description
This article analyzes the concept of judicial accountability. It builds on three recent books (?Independence, Accountability, and the Judiciary? edited by Guy Canivet, Mads Andenas and Duncan Fairgrieve; ?Transitional Justice, Judicial Accountability andthe Rule of Law? by Hakeem Yusuf; and ?Judicial Accountabilities in New Europe: From Rule of Law to Quality of Justice? by Daniela Piana) that deal with judicial accountability and suggests avenues for further research. In section 1, I briefly summarizethe content and key arguments of the three recent books on judicial accountability. Section 2 focuses on the relationship between judicial accountability and the concept of accountability. Section 3 deals with the three key questions of judicial accountability: accountability of whom, to whom, and for what. Section 4 is devoted to the role of cultural factors in holding judges to account.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—

Type
J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)
CEP classification
AG - Legal sciences
OECD FORD branch
—

Publication year
2013
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Similar results(10)