Are We Getting Good Decisions by Top-level Domain Name Dispute Resolution Providers?

Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F15%3A00084107" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/15:00084107 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://journals.muni.cz/mujlt/article/view/3055/3696" target="_blank" >https://journals.muni.cz/mujlt/article/view/3055/3696</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/MUJLT2015-1-7" target="_blank" >10.5817/MUJLT2015-1-7</a>

Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Are We Getting Good Decisions by Top-level Domain Name Dispute Resolution Providers?
Original language description
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) has offered unique solution to deal with disputes regarding the registration of internet domain names (so called trademark dilemma) in 1999. Uniform domain name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP)delimits procedural rules to solve such disputes and to create non ? binding decision (binding between involved parties) which approves / rejects the transfer of the domain name to new (trademark) owner. This paper has to focus on the question whether weare getting good decisions or the decisions in similar cases are decided more or less randomly. It is necessary to focus on such question also because of the fact that ICANN is planned to be transferred to the global multi - stakeholder community this year. Is the decision making process ready for such a big change or is it easily suggestible? To try to answer this question it will be necessary to go through the history and activities of ICANN and to focus mainly on UDRP process.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—

Type
J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)
CEP classification
AG - Legal sciences
OECD FORD branch
—

Publication year
2015
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Similar results(10)