All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F18%3A00103007" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/18:00103007 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319900674" target="_blank" >https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319900674</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90068-1_9" target="_blank" >10.1007/978-3-319-90068-1_9</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Czech Republic

  • Original language description

    The Czech Constitutional Court in its decision from 6 June 2006, file no. Pl. ÚS 42/04, rules that the constitutional principle of equality in rights belongs to those fundamental human rights that constitute a system of values of modern democratic societies. The principle of equality is a legally philosophical postulate at the level of positive law guaranteed by prohibition of discrimination. Equality is not a changeless category as far as it goes through development especially in the area of political and social rights. Also, the international documents about human rights and numerous decisions of international control bodies emanate from the fact that not every unequal treatment with different subjects can be qualified as violation of the principle of equality, or accordingly, as illicit discrimination of ones in comparisonwith others. Violation of this principle requires several conditions be met: different subjects being in the same or comparable situation are treated in a different manner unless there are any objective and reasonable reasons for applying a different approach. Herein it can be added that the European Court of Human Rights similarly states that difference in treatment among persons being in analogical or comparable situations is discriminatory unless it has any objective and reasonable justification.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    C - Chapter in a specialist book

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50501 - Law

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju

Others

  • Publication year

    2018

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Book/collection name

    Comparative Perspectives on the Enforcement and Effectiveness of Anti-discrimination Law. Challenges and Innovative Tools

  • ISBN

    9783319900674

  • Number of pages of the result

    21

  • Pages from-to

    153-173

  • Number of pages of the book

    567

  • Publisher name

    Springer International Publishing AG

  • Place of publication

    Switzerland

  • UT code for WoS chapter