Beyond Judicial Councils: Forms, Rationales and Impact of Judicial Self Governance in Europe

Result code in IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F18%3A00104967" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/18:00104967 - isvavai.cz</a>

Result on the web

<a href="https://static1.squarespace.com/static/56330ad3e4b0733dcc0c8495/t/5c17942c40ec9a9be8d40095/1545049133334/Vol_19_No_7_Kosar.pdf" target="_blank" >https://static1.squarespace.com/static/56330ad3e4b0733dcc0c8495/t/5c17942c40ec9a9be8d40095/1545049133334/Vol_19_No_7_Kosar.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Result language

angličtina

Original language name

Beyond Judicial Councils: Forms, Rationales and Impact of Judicial Self Governance in Europe

Original language description

A few years ago, judicial councils composed primarily of judges were viewed as a panacea for virtually all problems of court administration in Europe. The burgeoning literature on judicial councils has shown that this is not necessarily thecase. This article builds on this literature, but it argues that judicial self­ governance is much broader phenomenon than judicial councils and may also take different forms. Therefore, it is high time to look beyond judicial councils and to view judicial self–­governance as a much more complex network of actors and bodies with different levels of participation of judges. To that end this article conceptualizes judicial self­ governance and identifies crucial actors within the judiciary who may engage in judicial governance (such as judicial councils, judicial appointment commissions, promotion committees, court presidents and disciplinary panels). Subsequently,it shows that both the forms, rationales, and effects of judicial self governance have varied across Europe. Finally, this article argues that it is necessary to take into account the liquid nature of judicial self governance and its responsiveness to political, social, and cultural changes. Moreover, the rise of judicial self governance is not necessarily a panacea, as it may lead to political contestation and the creation of new channels of politicization of the judiciary.

Czech name

—

Czech description

—

Type

J_ost - Miscellaneous article in a specialist periodical

CEP classification

—

OECD FORD branch

50501 - Law

Project

—

Continuities

R - Projekt Ramcoveho programu EK

Publication year

2018

Confidentiality

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Name of the periodical

German Law Journal

ISSN

2071-8322

e-ISSN

—

Volume of the periodical

19

Issue of the periodical within the volume

7

Country of publishing house

DE - GERMANY

Number of pages

46

Pages from-to

1567-1612

UT code for WoS article

—

EID of the result in the Scopus database

—