All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Court Presidents: The Missing Piece in thePuzzle of Judicial Governance

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F18%3A00104968" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/18:00104968 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://static1.squarespace.com/static/56330ad3e4b0733dcc0c8495/t/5c1794ac70a6ad421591eaaa/1545049261205/Vol_19_No_7_Blisa_Kosar.pdf" target="_blank" >https://static1.squarespace.com/static/56330ad3e4b0733dcc0c8495/t/5c1794ac70a6ad421591eaaa/1545049261205/Vol_19_No_7_Blisa_Kosar.pdf</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Court Presidents: The Missing Piece in thePuzzle of Judicial Governance

  • Original language description

    The aim of this paper is to provide a new comprehensive understanding of roles of court presidents in judicial governance in Europe. It argues that in order to better understand the role of court presidents in comparative perspective it is necessary to unpack their power into smaller components that can be analyzed separately. We define seven such components: judicial career, jurisprudential, administrative, financial, ambassadorial, and media power, and ancillary powers as a residual category. Subsequently, we zero in on 13 European jurisdictions and rate them according to the strength of their court presidents’ powers. By doing so we are developing a Court President Power Index. Based on this Index we question the claim that Western court presidents are always weaker than their Eastern European counterparts and argue that powers of court presidents diverge both within Western Europe and within Eastern Europe, and hence it is difficult to draw the easy line along the West/East axis on this ground. Finally, we problematize our Court President Power Index and show that powers in the meaning of faculty do not necessarily translate into influence since various contingent circumstances (such as the length of court presidents’ terms of office, information asymmetry, the structure of the judiciary, the existence of competing judicial self governance bodies, the role of individuals, the proximity of court presidents to political leaders, the legal profession, legal culture, and the political environment) affect to what extent court presidents may exploit their powers in practice.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>ost</sub> - Miscellaneous article in a specialist periodical

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50501 - Law

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    R - Projekt Ramcoveho programu EK

Others

  • Publication year

    2018

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    German Law Journal

  • ISSN

    2071-8322

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    19

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    7

  • Country of publishing house

    DE - GERMANY

  • Number of pages

    46

  • Pages from-to

    2031-2076

  • UT code for WoS article

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database