Failed Expectations: Does the Establishment of Judicial Councils Enhance Confidence in Courts?

Result code in IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F18%3A00105250" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/18:00105250 - isvavai.cz</a>

Result on the web

<a href="https://static1.squarespace.com/static/56330ad3e4b0733dcc0c8495/t/5c1794d4f950b7d4a3786f2c/1545049300778/Vol_19_No_7_Urbanikova_Sipulova.pdf" target="_blank" >https://static1.squarespace.com/static/56330ad3e4b0733dcc0c8495/t/5c1794d4f950b7d4a3786f2c/1545049300778/Vol_19_No_7_Urbanikova_Sipulova.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Result language

angličtina

Original language name

Failed Expectations: Does the Establishment of Judicial Councils Enhance Confidence in Courts?

Original language description

Judicial councils are often presented as a panacea for many disorders of judicial systems, including low public confidence in the judiciary. Nevertheless, the assessment of their impact has so far been neglected. The article offers a unique view on the relationship between judicial councils and the level of public confidence in courts. It draws a novel conceptual map of factors influencing public confidence in the judiciary, stressing its complex and multifaceted character. Situating the judicial councils on the map, it explores how they can help to potentially increase the level of public confidence in the judiciary, and assesses to what extent this has been true in the countries that have adopted them. The results reveal a considerable gap between the promises, expectations, and practice, and raise doubts about the ability of judicial councils to enhance confidence in courts. Judicial councils rarely manage to substantially improve institutional performance: they can enhance the quality of judicial systems which have already functioned quite well, but they do not tend to bring about change in the judicial systems that have been previously significantly flawed. The analysis of the longitudinal Eurobarometer data showed that, on average, the EU countries without judicial councils are better off in terms of public confidence. Although the existence of judicial councils does not make a difference regarding public confidence in the judiciary in the new EU member states, in the old EU member states, judicial systems with judicial councils enjoy lower levels of public confidence than the ones without them.

Czech name

—

Czech description

—

Type

J_ost - Miscellaneous article in a specialist periodical

CEP classification

—

OECD FORD branch

50501 - Law

Project

—

Continuities

R - Projekt Ramcoveho programu EK

Publication year

2018

Confidentiality

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Name of the periodical

German Law Journal

ISSN

2071-8322

e-ISSN

—

Volume of the periodical

19

Issue of the periodical within the volume

7

Country of publishing house

DE - GERMANY

Number of pages

32

Pages from-to

2105-2136

UT code for WoS article

—

EID of the result in the Scopus database

—