Corruption and International Arbitration - The Arbitrators' Right to Investigate Corruption Sua Sponte
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F18%3A00108928" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/18:00108928 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.law.muni.cz/sborniky/cofola-international/cofola2018.pdf" target="_blank" >https://www.law.muni.cz/sborniky/cofola-international/cofola2018.pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Corruption and International Arbitration - The Arbitrators' Right to Investigate Corruption Sua Sponte
Original language description
Arbitration is a dispute resolution mechanism which is constituted upon party’s autonomy to settle a dispute in a private and confidential way. Criminal law on the other hand can be considered as a restriction on party’s autonomy since it protects general interests. Nevertheless, the paths of these two disciplines cross on the way to a fair and square decision. Arbitrators participate in this proceeding as private persons appointed through the arbitration agreements by parties. On the other hand, they are still playing an important role on the field of the international commercial business. The arbitration may be considered as a potential tool for a criminal conduct since arbitrators are measured as servants of individual private interests of parties. However, as globalization reflects itself in the growth of international trade and transactions, the same applies to the international arbitration. Arbitrators are servants of parties as much as they are guardians of ethics and moral behavior within the international trade. One may argue that arbitrators are ill-suited for an adjudication of such claims because of the nature of arbitration. The reason behind this statement is that rights and duties of arbitrators in combat with corruption during arbitral proceedings are limited. This paper focuses exactly on this issue. What is the position of arbitrators when they are facing corrupt activities of the parties? Could they commence the investigation and resolve this matter on their own?
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
D - Article in proceedings
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
50501 - Law
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Others
Publication year
2018
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Article name in the collection
COFOLA International 2018
ISBN
9788021090644
ISSN
2464-8485
e-ISSN
—
Number of pages
21
Pages from-to
39-59
Publisher name
Masarykova univerzita
Place of publication
Brno, Česká republika
Event location
Telč, Česká republika
Event date
Jan 1, 2018
Type of event by nationality
EUR - Evropská akce
UT code for WoS article
000461000000003