Revival of a Cancelled Legal Regulation in Bohemia, Moravia and Silesia and in Slovakia

Result code in IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F19%3A00113690" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/19:00113690 - isvavai.cz</a>

Result on the web

<a href="http://km.kazguu.kz/uploads/files/4%20%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%8C%D1%8F%20-%20Zden%C4%9Bk%20Koudelka%20(Czech%20Republic%2C%20Brno)%2C%20Ale%C5%A1%20V%C3%A1%C5%88a%20(Czech%20Republic%2C%20Karlovy%20Vary).pdf" target="_blank" >http://km.kazguu.kz/uploads/files/4%20%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%8C%D1%8F%20-%20Zden%C4%9Bk%20Koudelka%20(Czech%20Republic%2C%20Brno)%2C%20Ale%C5%A1%20V%C3%A1%C5%88a%20(Czech%20Republic%2C%20Karlovy%20Vary).pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Result language

angličtina

Original language name

Revival of a Cancelled Legal Regulation in Bohemia, Moravia and Silesia and in Slovakia

Original language description

The text deals with the revival of a legal regulation that was cancelled by a legal regulation that was subsequently cancelled by the Constitutional Court. It points out to the divided approach to the solution. The text results from the principles that unless the law explicitly stipulates otherwise, the cancelled legal regulation is not revived by cancelling the regulation that had cancelled it. The basic method used in the article is a comparison between the Czech Republic (Bohemia, Moravia, Silesia) and the Slovak Republic. The timeliness of the article is given by the fact that there is no uniform opinion on the solution of the problem and different solutions are adopted in individual cases. This undermines and weakens the principle of legal certainty. The revival of a cancelled legal regulation is possible, if the constitution and the law explicitly stipulate so, which is not the case of the legal system in Bohemia, Moravia and Silesia. The cancelation effects of a judgment of the constitutional court are for the future, not the past, otherwise it would be unconstitutional retroactivity. In Slovakia, the issue is solved by a legal directive regulating differently the consequences of derogation of a legal regulation (no revival) and its mere amendments or completions (revival). Unless the positive law states otherwise, there is no reason to adopt a different attitude to the consequences of the cancelation of a legal regulation by a legislator or by the constitutional court. Yet, it must be reminded that the constitutional court is not a positive law-maker and the revival of a legal regulation alone represents law-making.

Czech name

—

Czech description

—

Type

J_ost - Miscellaneous article in a specialist periodical

CEP classification

—

OECD FORD branch

50501 - Law

Project

—

Continuities

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Publication year

2019

Confidentiality

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Name of the periodical

Law and State

ISSN

2307-521X

e-ISSN

—

Volume of the periodical

2019

Issue of the periodical within the volume

4

Country of publishing house

KZ - KAZAKSTAN

Number of pages

15

Pages from-to

50-64

UT code for WoS article

—

EID of the result in the Scopus database

—