All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

The Role of Domestic Courts in the Strasbourg System

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F20%3A00114405" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/20:00114405 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.routledge.com/Domestic-Judicial-Treatment-of-European-Court-of-Human-Rights-Case-Law/Kosar-Petrov-Sipulova-Smekal-Vyhnanek-Janovsky/p/book/9780367361167" target="_blank" >https://www.routledge.com/Domestic-Judicial-Treatment-of-European-Court-of-Human-Rights-Case-Law/Kosar-Petrov-Sipulova-Smekal-Vyhnanek-Janovsky/p/book/9780367361167</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    The Role of Domestic Courts in the Strasbourg System

  • Original language description

    This chapter focuses more closely on the role of courts and judges in the implementation of Strasbourg case law. First, it identifies the various actors within the domestic judiciaries who influence the implementation processes. Subsequently, it zeroes in on the role of constitutional courts and ordinary courts in implementing Strasbourg case law. It identifies different motivations of domestic judges for engaging with the Strasbourg case law, shows different strategies domestic courts use towards the ECtHR, and discusses the factors that affect the relationship between domestic courts and the ECtHR. This chapter unpacked the domestic judiciary and identified its varied roles in the ECtHR’s case law implementation. It explained the high capacity of domestic judiciary to contribute to the effectiveness and domestic embeddedness of the Strasbourg Court’s judgments. However, it also showed that the domestic judiciary has to be further differentiated. There are numerous structural, institutional, and contingent factors that may largely influence how the given court treats the Strasbourg Court’s rulings. Even on the level of apex courts, there are several internal actors with potentially differing preferences and positions that may affect the treatment of the ECtHR’s case law by apex courts.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    C - Chapter in a specialist book

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50501 - Law

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/GA16-09415S" target="_blank" >GA16-09415S: Beyond Compliance – Domestic Implementation of International Human Rights Case Law</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2020

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Book/collection name

    Domestic Judicial Treatment of European Court of Human Rights Case Law: Beyond Compliance

  • ISBN

    9780367361167

  • Number of pages of the result

    20

  • Pages from-to

    36-55

  • Number of pages of the book

    306

  • Publisher name

    Routledge

  • Place of publication

    Abingdon

  • UT code for WoS chapter

    000783692500003