All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Preventing Harm: Interim Protection as an Aspect of Effective Judicial Protection

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F23%3A00130283" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/23:00130283 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://eltelawjournal.hu/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/ELJ_-2023_1-v3.pdf" target="_blank" >https://eltelawjournal.hu/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/ELJ_-2023_1-v3.pdf</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.54148/ELTELJ.2023.1.139" target="_blank" >10.54148/ELTELJ.2023.1.139</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Preventing Harm: Interim Protection as an Aspect of Effective Judicial Protection

  • Original language description

    Interim protection, together with other fair trial guarantees, helps to achieve the effective protection of rights in administrative justice proceedings. Under the Czech Code of Administrative Justice, interim protection is represented by two instruments, namely interim measures and suspensive effect. They have in common that they both protect the applicant from the risk of harm of considerable intensity. The decision on interim protection is a solution to the conflict between the applicant’s interest in prompt and effective protection against the contested act, on the one hand, and, on the other, the requirement to protect legal certainty, the stability of legal relations and the acquired rights and good faith of the other parties. The paper aims to cover the purpose and role of the institutes of interim protection in administrative justice, focusing on the substantive condition of imminent harm. In order to achieve this, it analyses a sample of decisions by the Supreme Administrative Court granting interim protection between 2019 and 2021. Analysis of the case law shows that five main categories can be distinguished in which the Supreme Administrative Court usually finds the imminent harm to be sufficiently serious. These relate to cases concerning foreign nationals (usually third-country nationals seeking residence or asylum), disproportionally high fines or tax obligations, withdrawal of driving licence, removal of constructions and disclosure of information requested through the Act on Free Access to Information.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>SC</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the SCOPUS database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50501 - Law

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Others

  • Publication year

    2023

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    ELTE Law Journal

  • ISSN

    2064-4965

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    2023

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    1

  • Country of publishing house

    HU - HUNGARY

  • Number of pages

    12

  • Pages from-to

    139-150

  • UT code for WoS article

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85175073964