Legitimacy of the judiciary in the interpretation of vague statutory provisions

Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F23%3A00131178" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/23:00131178 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://irjs.pantheonsorbonne.fr/sites/default/files/2023-07/Gealfow_RJS_no-7.pdf" target="_blank" >https://irjs.pantheonsorbonne.fr/sites/default/files/2023-07/Gealfow_RJS_no-7.pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—

Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Legitimacy of the judiciary in the interpretation of vague statutory provisions
Original language description
The article presents a philosophical analysis of works of Lon Fuller, John Locke and Charles Louis Monstesquieu and precises the consequences of their thoughts on the judiciary’s option to interpret vague statutory provisions. It further provides comparative analysis of the application of those concepts in case law of United States and the Czech Republic as a representant of the civil law systems. The article uses the methodology of balancing different constitutional values and principles and criticizes the practice of courts not applying the proportionality test while changing the interpretation of statutory provisions.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—

Publication year
2023
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Similar results(10)