All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Czech Presidents In Trouble: How Successful Can The System Be Against Presidential Misbehaviour?

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F23%3A00132079" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/23:00132079 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://acpo.vedeckecasopisy.cz/publicFiles/002726.pdf" target="_blank" >https://acpo.vedeckecasopisy.cz/publicFiles/002726.pdf</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.14712/1803-8220/16_2023" target="_blank" >10.14712/1803-8220/16_2023</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Czech Presidents In Trouble: How Successful Can The System Be Against Presidential Misbehaviour?

  • Original language description

    Presidents in parliamentary regimes are generally less powerful in their competencies and serve more as moderators of political disputes rather than as the main actors of executive power. Despite this, they can often appear at the edge of constitutionality in the performance of their powers. In Central Europe, it is the President of the Czech Republic who finds the greatest discrepancy between written and politically practised powers. Constitutional actors can bring a constitutional lawsuit, a competence lawsuit, or activate against the president Article 66, transferring the performance of certain duties to the other constitutional actors. Often, however, these instruments are not used. Semi-structured interviews with experts (N = 6) in the field of constitutional law revealed to us that the Czech president has broader powers than the Constitution gives him because many constitutional actors do not file a lawsuit even if they had a significant possibility of winning. Our analysis also showed that there are some cases where the experts disagree among themselves such as on the appointment of the governor of Czech National Bank. At the same time, this work revealed the different approaches of the individual presidents in the situations studied. © 2023 Institute of Political Studies. All rights reserved. Výsledek vznikl GAUK č. 146323

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>SC</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the SCOPUS database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50601 - Political science

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Others

  • Publication year

    2023

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Acta Politologica

  • ISSN

    1804-1302

  • e-ISSN

    1803-8220

  • Volume of the periodical

    15

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    3

  • Country of publishing house

    CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC

  • Number of pages

    25

  • Pages from-to

    68-92

  • UT code for WoS article

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85177182684