Constitutional Courts Asking Questions: A Deliberative Potential of Preliminary Reference Mechanism
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F23%3A00133615" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/23:00133615 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-yearbook-of-european-legal-studies/article/constitutional-courts-asking-questions-a-deliberative-potential-of-preliminary-reference-mechanism/F2DF8A4B46C0ACC5B4F82CDAA54B518A" target="_blank" >https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-yearbook-of-european-legal-studies/article/constitutional-courts-asking-questions-a-deliberative-potential-of-preliminary-reference-mechanism/F2DF8A4B46C0ACC5B4F82CDAA54B518A</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cel.2023.15" target="_blank" >10.1017/cel.2023.15</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Constitutional Courts Asking Questions: A Deliberative Potential of Preliminary Reference Mechanism
Original language description
This Article interrogates the role of national constitutional courts within the Article 267 TFEU preliminary reference mechanism from both descriptive and normative angles. First, I demonstrate that although a clear majority of the constitutional courts submit references to the ECJ on a more frequent basis, differences in individual approaches remain significant. Subsequently, I argue that the core normative attractivity of the questions submitted in the course of domestic constitutional review lies in their participative and deliberative potential. Compared to ordinary courts, constitutional courts are better suited to amplify the ‘unheard’ voices of immobile EU citizens. By counterbalancing the demands of the EU's functional constitution, which is primarily based on the ideals of market capitalism, constitutional courts’ questions may contribute to the EU's capacity to generate legitimate decisions. Finally, I put my theoretical claims in context and analyse the main ways in which such deliberative potential can translate into practice.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>SC</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the SCOPUS database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
50501 - Law
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/EF19_073%2F0016943" target="_blank" >EF19_073/0016943: Internal grant agency of Masaryk University</a><br>
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Others
Publication year
2023
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies
ISSN
1528-8870
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
2023
Issue of the periodical within the volume
First View
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
20
Pages from-to
1-20
UT code for WoS article
—
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85180744877