All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Constitutional Courts Asking Questions: A Deliberative Potential of Preliminary Reference Mechanism

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F23%3A00133615" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/23:00133615 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-yearbook-of-european-legal-studies/article/constitutional-courts-asking-questions-a-deliberative-potential-of-preliminary-reference-mechanism/F2DF8A4B46C0ACC5B4F82CDAA54B518A" target="_blank" >https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-yearbook-of-european-legal-studies/article/constitutional-courts-asking-questions-a-deliberative-potential-of-preliminary-reference-mechanism/F2DF8A4B46C0ACC5B4F82CDAA54B518A</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cel.2023.15" target="_blank" >10.1017/cel.2023.15</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Constitutional Courts Asking Questions: A Deliberative Potential of Preliminary Reference Mechanism

  • Original language description

    This Article interrogates the role of national constitutional courts within the Article 267 TFEU preliminary reference mechanism from both descriptive and normative angles. First, I demonstrate that although a clear majority of the constitutional courts submit references to the ECJ on a more frequent basis, differences in individual approaches remain significant. Subsequently, I argue that the core normative attractivity of the questions submitted in the course of domestic constitutional review lies in their participative and deliberative potential. Compared to ordinary courts, constitutional courts are better suited to amplify the ‘unheard’ voices of immobile EU citizens. By counterbalancing the demands of the EU's functional constitution, which is primarily based on the ideals of market capitalism, constitutional courts’ questions may contribute to the EU's capacity to generate legitimate decisions. Finally, I put my theoretical claims in context and analyse the main ways in which such deliberative potential can translate into practice.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>SC</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the SCOPUS database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50501 - Law

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/EF19_073%2F0016943" target="_blank" >EF19_073/0016943: Internal grant agency of Masaryk University</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Others

  • Publication year

    2023

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies

  • ISSN

    1528-8870

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    2023

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    First View

  • Country of publishing house

    GB - UNITED KINGDOM

  • Number of pages

    20

  • Pages from-to

    1-20

  • UT code for WoS article

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85180744877