Constitutional Conventions Concerning the Judiciary beyond the Common Law
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F23%3A00133742" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/23:00133742 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/german-law-journal/article/constitutional-conventions-concerning-the-judiciary-beyond-the-common-law/BBEAEA435D5C3DB694E64B4CA8929FF5" target="_blank" >https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/german-law-journal/article/constitutional-conventions-concerning-the-judiciary-beyond-the-common-law/BBEAEA435D5C3DB694E64B4CA8929FF5</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/glj.2023.90" target="_blank" >10.1017/glj.2023.90</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Constitutional Conventions Concerning the Judiciary beyond the Common Law
Original language description
Constitutional conventions are traditionally understood as socially binding, usually unwritten, rules of constitutional importance based on precedent which cannot be enforced before courts. This traditional approach has several limitations, because it debates the normative quality of conventions rather than how to find them and where the real power lies. By doing so it is disconnected from scholarship on informal institutions in social sciences. Moreover, scholarship on constitutional conventions focuses predominantly on common law countries and conventions concerning political branches. This article pushes the boundaries in both directions. It shows how constitutional conventions can be conceptualized in civil law jurisdictions, and also identifies informal practices and constitutional conventions governing the judiciaries. On a broader level, it argues that constitutional conventions as a normative concept can help to filter the informal practices and differentiate between simple repetitive behavior on the one hand and conventions as a subset of informal institutions on the other.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
50501 - Law
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
R - Projekt Ramcoveho programu EK
Others
Publication year
2023
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
German Law Journal
ISSN
2071-8322
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
24
Issue of the periodical within the volume
8
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
17
Pages from-to
1503-1519
UT code for WoS article
001193351300004
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85187501963