Crying Over Spilled Oil: The Brussels I Regulation and the Judicial Enforcement of Arbitral Awards

Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F23%3A00140080" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/23:00140080 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.law.muni.cz/sborniky/cofola-international/cofola-international-2023.pdf" target="_blank" >https://www.law.muni.cz/sborniky/cofola-international/cofola-international-2023.pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.P280-0469-2023-1" target="_blank" >10.5817/CZ.MUNI.P280-0469-2023-1</a>

Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Crying Over Spilled Oil: The Brussels I Regulation and the Judicial Enforcement of Arbitral Awards
Original language description
After the European Court of Justice (“ECJ”) has considered the scope of the“Brussels Regime” vis-à-vis arbitral proceedings insome of its landmark decisions such as West Tankers or Gazprom, the recent London Steam-Ship Owners’ Mutual Insurance Association (C‑700/20) judgment, in which the ECJ ruled on the interpretation of the notion of “irreconcilable judgments” within the meaning of Article 34 of the Brussels I Regulation, adds yet another piece to this already tricky puzzle. In this article, I am critically assessing the conclusions of the ECJ in the London Steam-Ship Owners’ ruling and discussing the implications of that decision for the future cohabitation of judicial and arbitral proceedings in the European Union.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—

Publication year
2023
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Similar results(10)