All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Judicial Resistance: The Shield and The Sword of Informality

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F24%3A00137550" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/24:00137550 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://edinburghuniversitypress.com/book-informality-and-courts.html" target="_blank" >https://edinburghuniversitypress.com/book-informality-and-courts.html</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Judicial Resistance: The Shield and The Sword of Informality

  • Original language description

    How do courts react to political interferences? A lot has been written on populist and autocratic leaders rigging the courts. Last decades are full of examples showing that courts can indeed be an easy target for governments enjoying large parliamentary majorities and little respect to the rule of law. Examples from Hungary, Poland, Slovakia, Ukraine, Turkey, Bolivia, or the USA confirm that political leaders skilfully navigate through a set of informal and formal strategies how to manipulate courts’s composition and decision-making. Nevertheless, only minor attention has so far been devoted to judicial reactions to political interferences. As this chapter demonstrates, courts are no passive observers of court-rigging efforts. On the contrary, they do retaliate implementing a wide scope of strategies going way beyond formal legal review of their government’s actions. This chapter analyses examples of judicial reactions to political interferences and zeroes in on the role of informal tools, practices and techniques in building democratic resilience of courts. Offering a categorization of resistance strategies, it argues that many resistance techniques in fact rely on informal networks and and alliances judges form within the courts (at domestic and supranational level) and with other non-judicial actors. The chapter hence offers a unique view at resistance via informality and extra-judicial activities that help judges form resistance alliances and decrease the window of opportunity of erosion actors to attack and strip them of power.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    C - Chapter in a specialist book

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50501 - Law

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    R - Projekt Ramcoveho programu EK

Others

  • Publication year

    2024

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Book/collection name

    Informality and Courts

  • ISBN

    9781399535250

  • Number of pages of the result

    18

  • Pages from-to

    136-153

  • Number of pages of the book

    328

  • Publisher name

    Edinburgh University Press

  • Place of publication

    Edinburgh

  • UT code for WoS chapter